Monday, September 14, 2009

Larger education spending increases corruption: ICW

The Jakarta Post | Mon, 09/14/2009 10:19 AM | National

On Friday, the Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) reported 142 graft cases, which allegedly took place at various institutions within the national education sector between 2004 and 2008, to the KPK for further monitoring and investigation.

“We want the [Corruption Eradication Commission] to monitor graft cases being tried at district courts and the legal processing of many cases that has remained stagnant, and also to investigate many cases in regions that have gained little attention from the general public,” ICW researcher Febri Hendri said after handing over a report on the 142 cases to the commission.

The cases were worth a total of Rp 243 billion and implicated 287 individuals, mostly public officials and school principals, Febri said. He cited numerous forms of graft in the sector such as the imposition of illegal fees, school construction projects markups, bribes to teachers and school principals.

Febri also urged the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and students’ parents to play more active roles in fighting increasing corruption in the education sector, in line with the recent increases to education spending.

Education is a large and important sector that the general public should monitor, he said, adding that the education sector had become a fertile ground for corruption since it was allocated a larger budget by the state government.

“Power abuses have been rampant not only at the National Education Ministry but also in provincial and regency/municipal administrations under regional autonomy,” Febri said.

Numerous power abuses and graft cases had remained unexposed because law enforcers and relevant stake holders had not paid enough attention to the sector, Febri said.

Separately Lody Paat, the coordinator of the Education Coalition, said the KPK could help reduce corruption by putting corruptors behind bars.

However, only transparent processes in designing budgets and keeping accounts open to inspections by students’ parents could really prevent power abuses and red tape in the sector, Lody said.

“I believe parents, teachers, principals, and other stakeholders must make budget plans together for schools and supervise implementation. They should be able to take part in educational budget planning from national to local levels,” he said.

The coalition had carried out several pilot projects in Garut and Tangerang to teach parents how to make and scrutinize schools’ budgets and accounts, Lody said.

Since 2003, the National Education Ministry has proclaimed school-based management that theoretically allows anyone to acquire schools’ budget reports, Febri said. “But, if you try to get these reports, many schools will not hand over this information,” he said.

Under school-based management, school committees, which include students’ parents and school staff, should plan for and scrutinize schools’ budget spending.

However, in most cases committees had not managed their education budgets effectively since most parents did not know how to scrutinize schools’ budget reports, said Jumono from the Students’ Parents Alliance for Education. (mrs)